Needs Assessment
TraveLite
homeconceptdesignevaluation
Introduction
 

Prior to designing TraveLite, we wanted to explore the ways in which people currently interact with travel guides and ways they felt print travel guides were lacking. We wanted to gather wide ranging ideas about the possibilities a customized, electronic might offer. We chose to run a focus group because (1) we wanted people's ideas to feed off each other, (2) the information we wanted to gather was qualitative and subjective in nature, and (3) we wanted to pose follow up questions and explore issues in detail.

We invited eight experienced travelers who use a guide when traveling. Six were graduate students from the UC Berkeley Computer Science Department and School of Information Management and Systems, one was a professional travel writer and the last an editor for a travel guide publishing company. In addition, we asked people to bring travel guides and information they had used for a trip. We hoped the presence of these guides would spur ideas about how travel guides could be made more useful.

Focus Group
Participant background
All of the participants travel on average at least once per year to locales that are unfamiliar. All the participants reported using the Internet and other technical tools prior to and during travel to research, purchase and communicate. This group roughly approximates the target customer of TravLlite - web savvy, frequent travelers who are accustomed to researching and purchasing travel related information and services from the Web.

Results

On current use of travel guides and travel planning behaviors

Participants reported that their planning needs differed according to whether they were on the road or researching before their trip. Before a trip, they would like to read up on a destination and find out about its history and culture. They would do some preparations regarding accommodations before departing, but would also want the ability to research accommodations in their guide while on the trip.

Most explored the index and table contents of travel guides first to get a high level overview of the information. The first task in planning a trip is to get an overall sense of the place in order to determine possible activities while in the country. This includes reading up in the background sections of the guide and perusing the photographs. While in this high level stage, participants mark points of interest with Post-it™ notes.

In deciding which guide to purchase, they explore through an entire guide quickly and purchase the guide with content that is most specific their interests in the region.

Our participants make decisions about where to travel based on:

  • recommendations from friends
  • dreaming of area, destination
  • time of year
  • getting there - time, difficulty
  • Spur of the moment, bargain
  • Top 10 lists/highlights
  • Visiting people

Once on the road, our participants read in more detail than they had prior to departure. The assumption is that detail is better understood in the context of new information gathered at the destination. For example, they would read about restaurants while on the road, but would not care too much about them prior to departure.

On current use of PDAs and technology while traveling
Participants reported that they routinely take PDAs when they travel. All use the device for the same tasks as when they are not travelling (i.e. calendar, addresses). All reported that they have looked for travel information formatted for the PDA in formats such as AvantGo. One participant has
built their own own web page of travel information before leaving with bookmarks and annotations for use during the trip. He accesses this page from internet cafes on the road. Nearly all participants use internet cafes and email to communicate with home during travel.

On the idea of customized electronic in general
As we expected, participants liked the idea of a web interface that allowed them to eliminate content they knew they would not use (i.e. hotels in a price range they could not afford, restaurants in cities they would not visit, etc.). Given that users would like to be able to choose a group of restaurants to include in their guides, we explored further to determine what sort of metadata are important to them in choosing restaurants.

The level of detail needed to build a guide depends on the type of trip being planned. The range extends from purchasing a pre-packaged guide to customizing a guide down to the last detail.

Results of Feature Voting

Restaurants

Votes Dimension Notes
2 Price
2 Location how far relative to GPS or entered point
1 Cuisine
1 Rating
Kosher/Vegetarian and other special diets
Kid Friendly
Smoking/non
Forms of payment accepted
Parking and special vehicle parking (bus, RV)
disabled access

Lodging

Votes Dimension Notes
single rooms available
1 utilities, amenities TV, hot water
1 good rooms recommendations
1 contact information

Pricing Models

Vote Suggestion
2 Free in exchange for targeted ads on each screen (like Vindigo-might work only for urban destinations)
3 Allow unlimited exploration, customization, pay for what take
Fully functional promo to download with all information incorporated
4 allow for changes to guide due to unplanned diversions (fits subscription model)
Shouldn't cost more for customized guide
If only purchase portion of entire guide, shouldn't have to pay for entire guide
Pay premium for customized guide - no info you don't need
If someone owns a PDA, their time is at a premium, so they are likely to pay for something that makes good use of their time. Up to date info is a plus for them.
Price point: about $20 for any guide that meets needs - whether small or large, one country or many
If three very separate places are included, can/should this be one guide?
Give away something to hook customers, then charge them for all of something

Miscellaneous Features

Votes Feature
7 updates on the road (sync up/beaming) > is it possible to dock remotely?
3 recommendations for activities (hikes, etc.)
1 airline information/ transportation information (prices, times, routes)
1 share itinerary (updates shared)
2 "where am I?" feature - must have GPS
panic button
2 send online postcards (also available through email) but upload postcards from PDA
feedback about how much room is left on the PDA for content
Synch between guide on website and guide on Palm-no matter where changes are made
Allow users to come back to the site and edit the guide, download again

Miscellaneous Information

Votes Information not currently provided
3 departure and arrival tax info (hidden surprise costs)
5 local events (arts, concerts, movies, festivals)
2 links to local resources (on web and PDA?)
subjective information, share information (confirming or denying information in guides)
date stamp on information - prevent stale information that is wrong
5 Up to date information
Advice about the length of time required to travel from point A to point B by various modes of travel - kept updated
1 Context sensitive translation information. I.e. looking at train information - phrases needed to buy a train ticket, tipping customs
2 Information for single female travelers
Applying our findings to the Experiment **Experiment stuff here.
Part of the goal in using a visualization tool to present data such as our is that users can quickly process and understand the meaning of their search in the context of the overall data.

After considering the results from this focus group session and how to apply them to choosing attributes for the experiment, we realized that there is a distinction between the metadata you will want to search over and the information you want to know about a restaurant. This will also differ depending on the destination and type of trip for which the user is planning. Therefore we realized that, in the eventual implementation, we will need to allow the user to choose which metadata to search over. This is particularly important when considering how to apportion screen space. In order to be readable, these visualizations need to be of a certain size and therefore need to be limited in the amount employed in the system.

 

^top


© copyright 2001 TraveLite. All rights reserved.
email: travelite@sims.berkeley.edu
Last modified: 01-May-2001